I looked at attached article for what the FDA will do. I don’t know what was accomplished if the FDA is only agreeing to remove some posts and web pages but doesn’t have to acknowledge publicly the support in so many studies for ivm effectiveness and safety, and make a public retraction of their prior guidance. Unless I missed something, by all appearances they haven’t changed their position. Perhaps they can make new posts and web pages? Disappointing.
FDA wins. Doctors win nothing. Lame. ‘..,the spokesperson said. “FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.” ‘
Wow, that's it? How about a public apology and retraction? They should have to do it front and center on the big narrative pushers like CNN and MSNBC.
I looked at attached article for what the FDA will do. I don’t know what was accomplished if the FDA is only agreeing to remove some posts and web pages but doesn’t have to acknowledge publicly the support in so many studies for ivm effectiveness and safety, and make a public retraction of their prior guidance. Unless I missed something, by all appearances they haven’t changed their position. Perhaps they can make new posts and web pages? Disappointing.
FDA wins. Doctors win nothing. Lame. ‘..,the spokesperson said. “FDA has not changed its position that currently available clinical trial data do not demonstrate that ivermectin is effective against COVID-19. The agency has not authorized or approved ivermectin for use in preventing or treating COVID-19.” ‘
If Ivermectin is used to treat Covid, then NO Covid Vaccines will be allowed to be used, that were given under the Emergency Act Authorization. .